In a free society laws subject to change
4:40-5:10
The purpose of democracy is to offer representation and an
equal voice for all the citizens. In addition the democratic government
national and local have a responsibility to maintain law and order in society
on a daily basis. In order to do the government, issues laws that are recorded
in official government documents such as the Constitution to provide the
security ad safety of people’s freedoms. Although most laws are fixed in society there are some laws that are subject
to change.
First consider a situation in which laws in a free society
are subject to change. This scenario often occurs when an existing law has
experienced a flaw such as a loop hole or resulted in unexpected circumstances.
For example, in many US
states there have been multiple “Stand your ground laws” state that acting in
self defense is legitimate from attacker, have been issued as legal and
legitimate until recently. In February 2012, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood
watch volunteer in Sanford, Florida was on his rounds in his neighborhood when
he believed to be under threat by 17 year old Trayvon Martin. Martin who was
walking home from school was talking on his phone. In the neighborhood
community retreat of Twin Lakes,
Zimmerman got suspicious and called the neighborhood watch for assistance in
further action. They advised him to follow, but lost track of him. Soon, at
night when Trayvon Martin was coming home from a convenience store, Martin
spotted Zimmerman. Martin and Zimmerman
exchanged words and apparently when
Zimmerman went to reach for his phone, Martin punched him in the nose. In
retaliation, Zimmerman shot Martin in defense. After this incident the black
community was outraged and asked for justice in that Martin was wrongly killed
and underestimated. The initial encounter with police did not result in arrest
because police sighted the “Stand your ground laws” as reasonable. However, the
black community insist it was a racial attack on an unarmed black teenager.
Currently, the “Stand your ground law” is being reviewed as to when it is ok to
act in defense from an attacker and when it is not. Since Martin was fatally
shot, “Stand your ground laws” is example when laws are subject to change in
free society.
In contrast, consider a situation in which laws in a free
society are subject to change. This scenario often occurs when an existing law
is very effective and helpful in protecting the safety of the citizens. For
example, consider the Department of Homeland Security/TSA mandatory pat down
and security checking laws implemented in airports. Despite earlier
controversies of the pat down, slight modifications were made but the laws are
still implemented to maintain safety in all public transport in rail and
flight. Another example, where laws remain stagnant are the NHRTA laws
regulating the importance of safety in public infrastructure, automobiles and
other transport vehicles. Since a lot of fatal car accident have occurred in
the past the NHRTA was formed to
implement safety standards for the safety and protection of all licensed
drivers. There have been tighter driving license examination and testing
procedures to make sure that drivers especially the youth and elderly are aware
of road and legal rules. Likewise, due to increased pollution and efforts to
reduce carbon emission the EPA has issued mandatory laws for automobile
manufacturers to design cars that burn clean natural gas and ethanol based
gasoline. Thus, it is evident that, laws are not subject to change when it is
effective in protecting the interests of the people.
Thus, it is circumstantial of when laws are subject to
change. If a law, such as the “Stand your ground law” has loopholes in causing
harm to people, like Trayvon Martin, then the law is to be changed to prevent
fatal incidents of violence similar to the Trayvon Martin shooting by George
Zimmerman. However, when a law is effective in protecting the interests and
safety of the people as well as the nation then the law remains stagnant. This
is especially true of laws relating to safety standards in all disciplines of
society. Overall there needs to be a fine balance between the 2 extremes.