In
business, competition is superior to cooperation.
12:30-1
In today’s world of Capitalism the bottom line for most
businesses and companies is that of profit incentive as well as growth. Many
businesses seek to out compete rivals in the same field of manufacturing in
hopes to gain more consumers resulting in more profit, hence cooperation
between companies is viewed as harmful to earning a profit. However are
specific times when competition is necessary and other times when cooperation
is necessary.
First
consider a situation in which competition is superior than cooperation in the
business world. When humanity is flourishing and more pocket money is
available, competition is a good method to allow companies to give alternative
options and choices for the consumer. In the case of any business, for example,
automobile manufacturers believe it is very important to compete against other
companies to make themselves appeal to customers, take more control of the
market share and gain more profit than competitors. In the case of Toyota and Honda, they
are control the car market because they offer cars with high fuel mileage at
reasonable prices compared to American companies. The major benefit of competition
though, companies are forced to stay abreast of the latest technologies and put
a lot into research and development of new products which ultimately benefits
the consumer. There is a lot of choice
for the consumer when competition is utilized and monopolies are not in place
which means the price of goods remains
low. Another example, is in today’s economic situation where many businesses
are being hit hard by the recession. In the 1990s many people invested in their
homes in hopes to get higher profit margin but when the housing bubble burst in
2007, people were panicked and had little or no savings left to spend for
economic growth. Due to the recession, many companies suffered and tried to
offer alternative options for consumers to meet their needs in tough times. For
example, electronics are a must in any household, the price is a determining
factor. Recently, Best Buy had announced closure of several 100 stores nation
wide because no merchandise was being sold most likely due to high prices.
Whereas, stores like Walmart and Staples have experienced company expansion
because of tailoring to customer needs at affordable low prices. In the end ,
competition is a must because it offers more options to the customers at
different price ranges meeting the needs of consumers.
In
contrast there are times when cooperation is superior to competition in the
business world. When humanity is under stress and suffering from a natural
disaster or a disease outbreak it is best for businesses to cooperate which
each other for the betterment of society. For example, in the recent outbreak
of Swine and Avian flu in 2009, pharmaceutical companies were under pressure
to find a drug that would curb and lower the incidences of H1N1 flu. In most
case pharmaceutical companies are most concerned with patenting drugs and
making a large profit off the patent but in the case of disease outbreaks,
competition should be set aside. Suppose Merck Institute generate an antiviral
drug that targets viral cell walls and Pfizer devised a drug that targeted
progeny of viruses as well reverse transcriptase then it seems reasonable for
both companies to put their innovations together as one product and cooperate
for the good of humanity. Thus when diseases break out, it is best for medical
companies to cooperate rather than compete for the betterment of human kind. If
drug companies competed instead of cooperating they would harm themselves
because, if consumers died from disease then they would have no customers left
to get profit from.
All
in all it is circumstantial as to when businesses cooperate or compete. When
humankind is suffering from a disease outbreak or times of natural disaster
companies should cooperate with each other to alleviate the problems faced by
consumers rather than competing. In contrast, when humankind is flourishing or
has some economic strain, then companies need to tailor to the needs of the
consumer by offering more choices at different prices in order to make a
profit. Also competition lowers prices of the same good and prevents monopoly
of the product or industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Give me feedback and/or score from J-T.