True leadership leads by example rather than by command
In any society leadership is essential to maintain order
amongst citizens. A leader is someone who takes an initiative for a common goal
and is looked for guidance or clarification. However, a leader can either use
direct command or portray using examples. With these options in mind a leader
can be effective when there is doubt amongst followers in any issue. Citizens
also have to determine what kind of leader is suitable and what they will
accomplish.
Firstly, consider leadership by command. There are certain
situations where command is necessary, such as in a country in political
turmoil. For example, is Adolf Hitler in World War II. In the midst of Post
Word War I, Germany had
surrendered to the US
and Allied forces after losing consecutive battles, thereby were forced to pay
reparations to the Allied forces. This put Germany and other European
countries in serious debt. In response to this Hitler, a Polish German,
migrated to Frankfurt and after seeing turmoil
in his homeland decided to take leadership. He started giving speeches in
meeting halls about Aryan white supremacy over Jewish inferiority, which
resulted in skyrocketing popularity amongst citizens. As a result, with a
strong desire to bring his homeland back on its feet, he used military command
through the Gestapo/SS to maintain order and achieve his goal.
On the other hand, not all situations need command and
giving examples will suffice. For example, to put a child in the right path the
parent will show the correct way to complete a task or adopting good habits. Over
a period of time through enforcement, audio or visual, will result in a pattern
of development for good habits in the child. For instance showing how to clean
up after one self or eating healthy food will make the child develop
responsibility in the future. Another example, is Mahatma Gandhi who led a
passive resistance movement against the British imperial rule by enforcing
non-violence and satyagraha, force of truth. After the British levied certain
commodities such as salt and other spices, Gandhi led his followers to the
ocean to extract salt from the ocean for themselves. Other such incidents,
included the Amritsar
massacre in 1933 where thousands of Sikhs organized a peaceful demonstration
for unity against the British. Both instances, show that people followed the
non-violence movement under a leadership that set examples of how to deal with
the situation.
All in all, leadership can either be accomplished by example
or command. Neither one is superior over the other. It is the scenario that
will determine what kind of leadership is needed. If there is a situation where
violence or turmoil is present then command is necessary whereas, if people are
working towards a common goal then leadership by example is effective.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Give me feedback and/or score from J-T.