An
effective leader must possess the ability not only to deal with current
problems, but also to anticipate future ones.
9:35- 10:05
Leadership is an essential part of life and it is the pulse
that helps keep the human race moving forward. However, leadership must be
effective to create change. Different scenarios require varying forms of
effective leadership that utilize different knowledge and set of skills, but is
uniform in all spectrums. Some qualities include cooperating as well as
motivating others to complete a task successfully under pressure. An important
characteristic for a leader is to deal with current problems but also
anticipate future ones.
First consider a situation when leaders must deal with
current problems and anticipate future problems. In the aftermath of 9-11
attacks in Washingon DC
and New York,
the Bush Administration as well as the general public were filled with shock
and insecurity. The government tried to calm the public down by assuring
everyone that extra security measures were being taken to prevent future
attacks of this magnitude. Eventually, the Department of Homeland Security and
the Transport Security Agency were established to enforce the security measures
in an effort to deal with future attacks. Likewise, with the increased fears
the Bush Administration took immediate action to weed out the source of
terrorism and declared war on terrorism by sending troops Iraq. By doing
so, Bush was trying to deal with a
current threat of weapons of mass destruction from Saddam Hussein. After
successfully removing Saddam from power, Bush then established an interim
government to deal with future problems of sectarian violence. Another example,
includes the 2009 and 2010 outbreaks of H1N1 swine and avian flu in the United States
and world wide. Initially the government was trying to prevent the disease
transmission and established quarantines to separate infected individuals. After
quarantines were established, the FDA manufactured vaccines for every flu
season to prevent the virus from spreading again. Both scenarios show that dealing with both
current problems and anticipating future ones is important.
On the other hand, dealing with current problems is more effective than anticipating
future problems. This is especially true when there are times of civil unrest
and widespread disapproval amongst citizens. For example in Egypt, the
ongoing civil unrest from President Mubaraq’s dictatorship resulting in his
removal and impeachment from office. Over the course of Mubaraq’s 30 years in
office after coming in power with military coup, the dictatorship is soon
coming to an end. Thousands of protesters were dismayed with his leadership due
to severe restrictions on the public. Protesters hurled bombs and grenades on Mubaraq’s army and eventually
with a united force of protesters, he resigned. Mubaraq and his party are
expected to receive the death penalty for his harmful action on innocent
civilians. Another example, is in Libya where former military leader
Mumar Gadaffi was also removed from power in a similar fashion. Gadaffi
established a dictatorship with the use of chemical weapons and the military.
Eventually with widespread disapproval he was removed from office from the
people. Both examples show that protesters dealt with the current problems of
restricted freedoms by overthrowing dictators.
All in all, it is circumstantial for a leader to deal with
current problems and anticipate future problems. If there is a national
disaster such as a terrorist attack or health scare it is important to take
immediate action for the current issue and eventually plan for the anticipated
problems. However, in the case of civilian unrest in autocratic countries, it
is important to take care of current issues because without freedoms people can
not live happily in a country to deal with the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Give me feedback and/or score from J-T.