Political
freedoms are best appreciated in those countries where they do not exist.
11:15 – 11:45
Political freedoms are a pinnacle part of a democratic
government and give a voice for the common man. Such freedoms include: freedom
of speech, free and fair elections, right to vote, , give a voice in public
affairs that affect them and express discontent on matters without fear from
the governing body. When a democratic nation is experiencing a period of
economic surplus and success these political freedoms are taken for granted.
However, when the nation is facing economic hardship such as a recession, or
loss of morale then the importance of the rights become clear by demanding for
change. However, in some cases there are countries that don’t have these freedoms
due to totalitarian rule but if they were educated about the democratic process
would use it to change their society for the better.
First consider situations where political freedoms are best
appreciated in countries that lack these freedoms. A notable example, would be
under a authoritarian government such as a dictatorship in Africa
or the Arab world. For instance, in Zimbabwe
there have been major spurts of violence and political unrest in Harare and neighboring
cities because of political factions that fight for dominance. One sect has
fought in support for Robert Mugabe who supports totalitarian rule as a dictator, and the other for Morgan Tsavangari,
President for democratic rule. However, people are struggling to find which
leader is successful because there have been times when Robert Mugabe has
monopolized the idea of banning free speech and voting rights, and the on the
other hand there have been times when democracy has had its voice. As an
ongoing conflict, it is evident that many citizens want a democratic government
because people will have fair representation. Another example, would be in the
Arab world in countries like Pakistan
and Iraq.
In both cases, totalitarian government predominated and ruled society. Under
Saddam Hussein in Iraq,
many people suffered under the Shia and Sunni divide where Shia were a minority
and suffered great discrimination. In response to this Saddam Hussein took
revenge and established a dictatorship where Shia would dominate and made the
Sunni majority suffer. He established strict rules of what people could do in
public. For example, women were not allowed to vote, wear visible clothing,
women were to be fully covered head to toe, and the Sunni majority were
restricted to hold high positions in industry. Likewise in Pakistan, under the military coup
of Gen. Pervez Musharaf, Hindus and other minorities that were not affiliated
with Islam suffered great pain. Hindus were not allowed to share pubic
facilities with Islamic counterparts, separate education facilities and could
not vote or take part in societal issues. As a result, it is clear that under
dictatorships, political freedoms would benefit citizens to enhance their
countries to give a voice to the people.
On the other hand, there are countries that have political
freedoms but don’t express interest in using them even where it is existent.
For example the United
States is one of the most famous democracies
in the world that has a very organized system of voting, rule and regulations.
However, voting is not a compulsory part of the democratic process and people
aren’t penalized for it. However, the only times US citizens tend to vote is
when a major change or upheaval is needed to improve the situation of the
economy or healthcare system. In 2008, voters went to the polls and
overwhelmingly voted for a Democratic president. They expressed wide discontent
for foreign policy decisions (i.e., Iraq war and handling of War on
Terror) of the sitting 2 yr term of
Republican President Bush and voted in the name of "change." During
the apex of the economic crisis two years later, voters came out in huge
numbers and placed a Republican majority in the house. They also exercised
their political freedom of voting to demand "change." Indeed, political
rights are most used and expressed when problems arise.
In all, it is evident that political freedoms are
appreciated mostly in countries that that lack these freedoms. Under
dictatorships, strict rule prevent citizens from expressing their true opinions
on issues but if political right were granted to these citizens they would use
it to change their society for the better. On the other hand, in democratic
countries political freedoms are not appreciated enough or used until economic
crises or other hardships come knocking on their doors.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Give me feedback and/or score from J-T.